Why per engagement?
Planning makes capacity visible. Working one assignment together does not mean everyone has the same position. ProSafetyMatch makes clear what that assignment means. As independent infrastructure, it gives each party its own voice within one shared operational dossier line. Per assignment you record what teams otherwise solve ad hoc, so client and professional, and where involved an agency or intermediary, keep the relevant core context traceable within each role, with mobile token confirmation where that fits.
Why this exists
Planning alone does not make an assignment transferable.
Loose planning, email and chats give too little traceability. ProSafetyMatch makes the factual assignment clear: role, mandate, agreements, changes, reporting, confirmation and handover.
Planning
Planning organises capacity.
In practice
Most ambiguity arises when it is unclear who instructs, executes, holds mandate, replaces, or operationally follows up on an incident.
ProSafetyMatch
ProSafetyMatch keeps the factual assignment line during the work: four dossier axes, changes, signals and handover. The engagement dossier is the reconstructable result. No general live three-party workspace: two active parties work per dossier within their role.
Longer chains
Client → chain partner → agency → professional
In longer chains, commercial clientship often sits with a different party than the day-to-day collaboration. Operational instructions, briefing, relevant information and purchasing can come from different links. Each party often sees only part of the work. ProSafetyMatch records the relevant dossier moments within existing roles — without promising one general live four-party workspace.
Client
Role, mandate, briefing and escalation route within the engagement.
Chain partner
Visibility of change and handover further down the chain.
Agency / intermediary
Preparation, selection context, replacement and follow-up made demonstrable.
Independent professional
Response, reservation, report and contribution on the same assignment line.
The relevant core context stays traceable within each role. Matching, rates and payment stay outside ProSafetyMatch.
The four dossier axes
Four dossier axes: direction, mandate and execution, replacement and handover, incident and follow-up. One answer per axis, in the same dossier.
Who gives operational instructions during the assignment?
Who decides at a deviation or stop?
Are substitutions allowed, and under what conditions?
Who decides operationally or follows up on an incident?
Direct 1-to-1 engagement
ProSafetyMatch works directly between client organization and professional, or on a route where an agency, platform or other intermediary is involved. A client and professional can work together in one engagement record; an agency is not a required dossier party. They work on their own agreements and terms. ProSafetyMatch records what applied up front, how the four dossier axes were answered, what changed along the way and which factual contribution was recorded. Broader market rollout is controlled: product access runs through selected controlled pilots, following explicit setup of roles, access, tenant scope and approval — not self-service and not generally available.
What this gives you
Less interpretation during execution, less re-checking afterwards and a dossier that remains transferable for client organizations, finance or internal follow-up. When an assignment changes or is cancelled, the record shows what changed, when it happened and which operational context was recorded. ProSafetyMatch does not decide compensation or legal consequences.
Comparison with planning and supplier management
Need a faster explanation for prospects or internal stakeholders? See the comparison page.